Elevating user experience one article at a time.™
UX Magazine Staff

First Beta Launch

Here we go then. After months of working in the few crumbs of spare-time that we could scrape up we’ve finally done it and launched UX Magazine. We’re pleased with a lot of it but also know that a lot of work still needs to be done; a lot.

First off, we’re trying to remain XHTML strict and are avoiding hacks best we can but IE still misbehaves here and there. Annoying, yes, but the site works well enough to be released into the general population. There are certainly some bugs in other browsers here and there. Ah, the joys of web-development.

Secondly, We have a list of stuff to do before we can be certain that this site is truly user friendly. The tool tips on the Link Pool and the Feeds aren’t quite there yet. We need to make the preview text of articles clearer and some features are just plain missing.

Last but not least, we’re not happy. We never are. Never ever. We look at things and go “bah!”—out loud, numerous times a day. We just had to stop being so bloody picky and launch the damn thing. But that doesn’t mean we’re not going to fix these things. So while we’re excited about launching the site, we’ll probably never be 100% happy with it, and that’s the way it should be.

In the meantime, please comment (right here) on things you love, hate, are puzzled by. We’ve probably missed shed loads of important stuff so help us make UX Magazine what you want it to be.

UPDATE (19/12/05): We’ve applied a nasty hack and “fixed” some IE bug which just won’t go away otherwise. This is just band-aid but it will have to do for now. We’re also killing off the tool tips we had as we were getting too many issues with them. Shame because they were damn pretty.

UPDATE (20/12/05): Latest changes include a lot of stuff noticed by our visitors (thank you very much).

  1. We removed the email link from all our commenter’s. Now only a web link will be applied, if entered. (noticed by Alex Casanova)
  2. Fixed the home page a bit, still needs work though. Added the TextPattern credits (question asked by Roshambo)
  3. Changed the tabindex on the comment forms. Now it works as it should. (thanks Greg)
  4. The last update info in the SnapShot box on the Home page, now displays the actual last update time, including the comments.
  5. And last but not least, it seems Del.icio.us is back up, so now you can also see our Link Pool list on the home Page.

UPDATE (20/12/05) Part Deux: Got some new tabs done as the older ones where accused of being, well, rather crap. You can check out their dark chromed goodness by look at the top bar; ooh, shiny… CMD fixed some CSS stuff I broke while hacking away to get IE to bloody work. He also added a smooooth “back to top” at the bottom of every article. We’re working on a better way of integrating that into the design.

UPDATE (21/12/05): We’ve merged the search and tabs and fixed some issues in the process. With Christmas approaching fast, we’re scrambling to fix as much as possible before we’re all off for the holidays. IE unfortunately still misbehaves. The feedback and exposure we’ve been getting has been tremendous, which kind of freaks me out because there’s still so much to do. It’s 4am, I’m going to bed. Thanks for dropping by.

UPDATE (23/12/05): We’ve been very busy trying to get most of your comments into our layout. All of your remarks, complaints and praises have been very helpful. So to keep this note short, here’s what we’ve done so far:

  1. We’ve cleaned up our CSS. If anyone tries to validate it, they will get an error. It’s an ugly hack we’ve added, but will get rid of it shortly.
  2. We added more informative page titles.
  3. We finalized the “tab” & “search” design.
  4. We removed the horizontal scroll bar. The full fix will come when we get around to restructuring the whole site… Should be right after Xmas holidays.

UPDATE (23/12/05) Part Deux: Just got around to changing the descriptive text on all articles. The excerpt is now properly displayed.
Also please forgive us if you’ve been receiving one-too-many RSS updates on our articles. We’ve been fidgeting with the Feed a bit… until we get things sorted.

end of article

92 Comments

Comment feed | Back to Top

Kostas 'KALEV' Alevizopoulos
19 December 2005, 09:56 ( Permalink )
Waiting for this from the last post from projectneo.com. I ‘m gonna miss it but…Anyway.
Constantinos Demetriadis
19 December 2005, 10:36 ( Permalink )
Well, it just seems that our initial launch not only has been delayed by a week (we were supposed to have launched on Dec 11th) but it also has been plagued by third party outages.

Del.icio.us has been playing up on us throughout the past week, and while they seemed to have everything under control on Friday, they have plunged this morning. Read more about their server hiccups here .

On our part, we’re doing the best we can to get UX Magazine rolling, but it seems it’ll take a bit longer than expected before we remove the BETA tag. Please don’t hesitate to write in your thoughts, ideas and any bugs you find (surely you will)...

Feel free to contact us directly at info(at)uxmag.com or post directly using the comment form. We’re expecting to hear form you…
Penlix
19 December 2005, 12:51 ( Permalink )
Good luck getting ahead with your project. We’ll certainly miss Projectneo, but I have a feeling, UXMag is going to be something that will really fill some gaps on the web today! All the best of luck!
Dimitris
19 December 2005, 13:05 ( Permalink )
The site looks excellent, stil no bugs but I’m on a pc cause my mac’s hard drive died on me. I will test it on some browsers on a mac and post any bugs that I’ll found. One thing only. I don’t quite like the fact that the articles are so close on the left edge of the browser, from my point of view it needs a bit more space, but that’s just me.

Anyways, I just love the site, but I’ll miss the blue colour of projectneo. Awesome stuff, keep up the good work.

Best wishes,
Dimitris
Kostas 'KALEV' Alevizopoulos
19 December 2005, 15:01 ( Permalink )
Open in new window? Why i have to check this everytime? I think you must turn it to default.
Constantinos Demetriadis
19 December 2005, 15:35 ( Permalink )
KALEV: It should keep your preferences in a cookie. As for the anchor attribute “target”, in XHTML 1.0 Strict it is obsolete, so we use a custom script for all our external links, you get to decide if you want a new window. You can read more here .

PS: I would like to ask all our commenter’s to also include their Browser (name & version) and OS they’re viewing the site with. It’ll help us out a lot.
Andrew Chai
19 December 2005, 15:50 ( Permalink )
Looking good fellas! Looking good! All the best.
Mike D.
20 December 2005, 00:28 ( Permalink )
Holy crap, I really like this design a lot. Can I spread the word yet?
Roshambo
20 December 2005, 01:59 ( Permalink )
Just curious; is this site running on TextPattern?
Alex Casanova
20 December 2005, 02:02 ( Permalink )
I noticed that the email field in the comment form on this page reads “required but won’t be displayed,” yet everyone’s email addresses are being displayed. Any chance on fixing that?
Greg
20 December 2005, 02:18 ( Permalink )
I have to add my kudos here. Can’t wait to see the copy cats that are sure to come.
Miko
20 December 2005, 04:01 ( Permalink )
Wow, great concept.
Constantinos Demetriadis
20 December 2005, 08:10 ( Permalink )
Andrew Chai: Thanks Andrew, it’s been a long time since ProjectNeo!

Mike D: You can spread the word, but we still are in Beta and have much work to do… We’re still sorting things out. But any support would be appreciated.

Roshambo: Yes. UX Magazine is running on TextPattern 4.0.2.

Alex Casanova: hm… it shouldn’t be displayed. Will Fix it ASAP. Thanks for noticing.

Greg, Miko: Thanks fellas. It means a lot to us.
Petros Dimitriadis
20 December 2005, 09:53 ( Permalink )
Good luck guys, really good work. I am sure all the css galleries will include it.

Contstantine great surname ;-) by the way.

Firefox 1.5
Windows XP
Stamatis Karastamatiadis
20 December 2005, 11:14 ( Permalink )
Very nice. I really like the way columns are positioned when u resize. I use the “open link in new tab” on Firefox for every link i click so i am not using the “Open in new window” option. It is a cool option u have there anyway :) . Is projectneo never coming back ?

Firefox 1.5
XP Pro
Constantinos Demetriadis
20 December 2005, 11:31 ( Permalink )
Stamati: In essence ProjectNeo never went away. UX Magazine is the evolution of what once was ProjectNeo. It’s only natural to move on…

ProjectNeo has been upgraded to something more than just a design related community site. At least that’s the way I see it.

But you never know what can happen in the future ;)
Kev Mears
20 December 2005, 11:47 ( Permalink )
Lovely layout and look. Love to have you share some of your textpattern secrets, but maybe that’s just too cheeky.

Good luck. I’m staying tuned
Lode
20 December 2005, 13:51 ( Permalink )
Verry nice! I bet this site could become very popular very soon. I hope your servers can cope with the popularity better than del.icio.us or Typepad.
Anthony Kyriazis | Onyro.com
20 December 2005, 14:00 ( Permalink )
Congrats dude for finally getting this site live, its gonna rock!!!
Petros Voulgaris
20 December 2005, 16:00 ( Permalink )
Great work guys. I wish u the best!
Ben
20 December 2005, 16:28 ( Permalink )
This is beautiful! Congrats, keep up the good work
Vangelis
20 December 2005, 18:46 ( Permalink )
What to say more? Beautifull!!!!!! Well done guys!
Jay Jones
20 December 2005, 19:31 ( Permalink )
I don’t know if this has been brought up before, but to first-time visitors, there is (as in my case, but I figured it out) some confusion with the little icons on article blocks on the homepage. The green ”+” looks like it’s meant to add something… the “X” looks like it’s supposed to close something, the ”=”... well… I don’t know.

I think the design is well-done and extremely appealing, but being a UX site, I would have expected more clear icons, as the ”+” and “X” boxes are already substantiated GUI elements to many users.

And not to be nit-picky (seriously, I love the work you’ve all done) but the tooltip hover on the linkpool can be downright confusing. Hovering over a link obscures ‘exactly’ the link below it, which makes it feel like hovering on that item actually ‘changed’ another item. In this case, I would recommend off-setting that tooltip so it only slightly obscures, but still reveals the items around it.

Again, I hate to be critical on this, but I thought I’d pass along my thoughts.

Great work, guys.
Dimitris
20 December 2005, 20:01 ( Permalink )
My first post was on a laptop running Windows XP with a 1024×768 screen resolution, not I am on Mac OS X with Safari and the site rocks… Excellent work.

This is the new projectneo, UX Mag rocks!

My best,
Dimitris
Alexoid
20 December 2005, 22:14 ( Permalink )
Thanks for all the great feedback. This is very much an open beta so we’re really appreciating all the info you’re sending our way. Still lot’s to do…

Jay Jones: You’re spot on about the icons. We’ve been discussing this for a while and I think we’re going to switch them to something far clearer like: D for design, T for technology, etc… We might also find space for a little legend somewhere. Well spotted.

Also, tooltips are gone, dead, blamo. We just haven’t gotten round to it. Basically, we’re thinking of replacing the whole sidebar (links+feeds) with a tabbed element which can show much more info, so no need for tooltips. Once again, good call.

No need to be sorry. The site is still under construction in front of everyone, we’re still undecided about many things—we want criticism! (Well, not too much.)
Ollanta
20 December 2005, 23:18 ( Permalink )
Hope someday I would be able to design like this.
Waiting for your production version!
Ollanta Humala
Phu
20 December 2005, 23:21 ( Permalink )
Congratulations on a fantastic piece of work! Well done guys!
Rob Winters
21 December 2005, 08:32 ( Permalink )
This site is amazing. Well done. The attention to detail is incredible.
Heiko
21 December 2005, 08:59 ( Permalink )
Good luck for this very interesting project. But the Internet Explorer/Win 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and Opera below 7.6 doesn’t supporting the CSS Layout very well ( just the Homepage ). By the way nice design!
Alexoid
21 December 2005, 10:47 ( Permalink )
Heiko: Thanks. We’re working on the site working on the current standards compliant browsers + IE6. We’ll apply work-arounds for older browsers when we’re satisfied with the structure (which we’re not currently).
Heiko
21 December 2005, 12:40 ( Permalink )
Alex I will promote your OnlineMagazine on my weblog, because I do like the idea of it!
Alexoid
21 December 2005, 13:12 ( Permalink )
Heiko: Appreciate it, thanks!
Maria T
21 December 2005, 14:14 ( Permalink )
Great to see so many Greek names under such a beautiful and well crafted publication. Soz for been a chauvinist :)
veracon
21 December 2005, 14:59 ( Permalink )
Horizontal scroll in Firefox 1.5; both on Windows and Linux. Might be an extension, though I doubt it since I only have Adblock and Web Developer installed.
Constantinos Demetriadis
21 December 2005, 16:39 ( Permalink )
veracon: I saw the scrollbar also. It had nothing to do with the FF extensions. Just a refinement in our CSS swapping script. It should work ok now.
Dave P
21 December 2005, 17:50 ( Permalink )
Beautiful Site, I really like it.

The layout however, seriously breaks in Firefox 1.5/Win using anything smaller than 1034×947. The front page degrades nicely regardless, but the article pages certainly do not.

That’s a weird size to design to in general, and being that even though I use a 21 inch monitor, I browse the web at 1024×768, it may warrant some attention.

As I said before, wonderful looking site!
alexdesigns
21 December 2005, 20:50 ( Permalink )
Just heard about your new website via friend. The site looks good and seems to have started to create a viral buzz. Good luck, it should take off quickly!
Stratos A.
22 December 2005, 07:33 ( Permalink )
Well done and well crafted so far. I did not expect anything less from u guys :)

Keep the creative (or coding ) flow running.
Bryan Buchs
22 December 2005, 15:02 ( Permalink )
Looking good. I would suggest updating the TITLE tags throughout the site, especially on the Article pages – makes bookmarking an article difficult.
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
22 December 2005, 18:08 ( Permalink )
Thanks for the comments. We’re working on fixing many of the dynamic scaling bugs as well as adding titles today. We’ve spent a lot of time reorganising our CSS files and cleaning up the content which should make bug-fixing much easier.
Jim Amos
22 December 2005, 22:30 ( Permalink )
If you bump the font-size up just once or twice the site becomes unreadable. Are you sizing everything in ems? Any absolute positioning? Something is not allowing the layout to be very flexible upon resize..
Panos Sambrakos
23 December 2005, 04:17 ( Permalink )
How very nice. Oh my lovely CMD. You’ve outdone yourself again! Cheers.
GaBuBu
23 December 2005, 11:11 ( Permalink )
Brilliant!
Charis Tsevis
24 December 2005, 03:45 ( Permalink )
Hi guys! You did it again! Great site and fresh content!
All the best for UXmag!
Dimitry B
24 December 2005, 08:26 ( Permalink )
Looks even better now!
“Open in new Window?” box takes its own line. I’m not sure if that’s what you meant by removing the horizontal bar.

Happy Holidays!
Theo
24 December 2005, 13:42 ( Permalink )
Great !
Andrew
24 December 2005, 16:46 ( Permalink )
Merry Christmas people ;)
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
24 December 2005, 18:22 ( Permalink )
Happy holidays to all. Thanks for dropping by.
Dimitris
25 December 2005, 13:58 ( Permalink )
Merry Christmas and happy holidays.

Just to point out that I am on windows with firefox and the resolution is 1024×768 and the little illustration of the author and the most artive articles etc are now below here and not on the right side as it is with IE.
Viktor
9 January 2006, 14:03 ( Permalink )
Looks great!
thinsoldier
12 January 2006, 22:30 ( Permalink )
ok, I have to ask. Does it annoy you that Safari will not allow your search box at the top of the page to look like how you styled it to look?

Well, it annoys me.

Also, have you ever desired to style the scrollbars on a textarea or overflowing div?
Alexoid
13 January 2006, 14:46 ( Permalink )
thinsoldier: Yeah, it kills me. I’ve been having similar problems with XP overiding buttons and the Google Toolbar changing the style of text fields. sigh We’ll work around it somehow, we have to. For those who don’t have access to Safari: this is how it comes out.
Ben
20 January 2006, 20:30 ( Permalink )
I think the current layout is absolutely fantastic. The magazine effect of small teaser images is extremely intuitive and enviable.
Oded
20 January 2006, 20:43 ( Permalink )
I LOOOVE your site. I think you guys did an amazing job with the layout of the homepage and especially the articles.

A few things:

1) Why you don’t have a Contact page?

2) In FF there’s a bug in the articles page. The writer image won’t slide to the right side and it covers the writer’s title.
Marco Koch
21 January 2006, 14:24 ( Permalink )
I really like your site and your layout! Is it possible to submit my User Interface Blog (http://www.user-interface.org) to your Feed Merger?
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
24 January 2006, 19:13 ( Permalink )
Oded: Thanks. We’re working on adding a contact form and are completely reworking the sub-page. More on that soone.
Nemanja
29 January 2006, 15:12 ( Permalink )
Lovely layout and look. I love color`s ! My site is so green but now will be so red….
david b
31 January 2006, 01:09 ( Permalink )
I really love the design and article, here. a few things thought. there is no clear way to contact you guys through private email, thus my post here. I was wondering that you might want to remove the XHTML and CSS compliant buttons at the bottom of the page, being that this site is geared to designers, those buttons SCREAM ‘press me’, and i am sure you are aware of the problems there.

Im not saying that you should run out and stamp all those issues imediately, just don’t advertise that you are compliant and you really are not, just looks bad IMHO.

other than that I LOVE the visual design of this site and have made it a daily read. Thax for this guys/girls
Constantinos Demetriadis (uxmag.com)
31 January 2006, 08:45 ( Permalink )
david b: Thanks for the ups. As for the validation buttons we have, well they both seem to be working. We validate XHTML 1.0 Strict and CSS .

There are some of our older articles which need a bit of correcting, but I’m pretty sure we’ve solved most of our issues by now.

If there’s something in particular you’ve noticed, please let us know.

And about the contact details, you can find our direct email in the About UX Magazine section.

I would like to take this moment though, to remind all our readers that UX Magazine is still in BETA, which means we’re still working on the site.

Keep up the feedback, we need it. Thanks.
Larry
31 January 2006, 23:10 ( Permalink )
Site looks excellent guys! Very clean.
Mo
31 January 2006, 23:26 ( Permalink )
Amazing work. Although I liked ProjectNeo, this is most definitely a suitable replacement. It’s now in my collection of Featured Sites.
Hong Hui
1 February 2006, 04:45 ( Permalink )
Hello and thanks to cssvault.com, i think i have stumbled upon a useful resource there! :p

Apologies if this feedback has been given. I have noticed that the layout seems to be rendering wrongly on a 1280×1024 resolution, 17 inches LCD monitor.

The “linkpool” column seem to be dumped at the right most corner of the page and the layering seems to be jumbled up at the bottom right hand corner.

Here’s the screenshot for better visualisation(pls note that the pix is cropped and compressed.) – http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic.php?u=5435IamRs&i=778563

Thank you and i shall now savour the prospect of gaining more new knowledges here. :)
Alex Schleifer (UX Magazine)
1 February 2006, 14:18 ( Permalink )
Hong Hui: My bad! I was messing about with the CSS at 3am and had messed up the code. It’s all good now and we’re doing all the messing about on a development version of the site. I can’t be trusted. Thanks!
AG
1 February 2006, 17:01 ( Permalink )
Why launch a magazine, of all things, as a beta?

In fact, I’m really curious as to why you guys put all this time and effort into developing something that, to a significant degree, runs in parallel with extant magazines and other communication efforts.

What needs did you feel weren’t being addressed by the existing UX-centric publications online? What perspectives did you feel you could bring to these discussions that weren’t being acknowledged?

Over the last seven years now, I’ve been asked to join one UX group after another, been sent links to a long stream of site launches, and watched with some dismay and trepidation as each turned out to consist largely of the same three articles written over and over again. (I particularly don’t think CSS is, in the end, all that interesting to those many of us who perceive the practice of UX as transcending the Web entirely.)

The lesson I draw from this is that, while there may in principle be a large enough community of UX practitioners to support a regular publication effort, there does not exist a comparable critical mass of those able to provide engaging and well-thought-out UX content. So unless you’ve dug up some previously-unacknowledged stratum of Secret Masters, I guess I’m wondering where you’re going to get fresh, new, well-articulated content from.

In the end, none of this – however snarky it may seem – is to discourage you. I, for one, would love to see a well-designed and -produced magazine devoted to design for the user experience (or maybe just “design”), and there’s no reason why yours couldn’t be the one. I do think, however, that you’ve significantly underestimated the challenges involved in producing something of worth. I wish you all the luck in the world, but still more than that I urge you to dig a little deeper.
Maternitus
1 February 2006, 18:29 ( Permalink )
The site looks okay and I am still roaming it. Good thing you actually show, here and there, how you have built things. Much appreciation about that, I am never too old to learn new things.

Fedora Core 4
Firefox 1.5
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
1 February 2006, 23:56 ( Permalink )
AG: Why not launch a magazine as a beta? We decided to let people in before we were completely finished, we thought it’d be interesting for our readers and ourselves. It has been but mostly it’s been fun. Also, it’s important to note that we’re busy (and somewhat lazy) people so if we’d waited for this thing to be finished you’d still be seeing an “under construction” page.

There will always someone somewhere doing something similar but from the feedback we’ve been receiving people seem pretty happy with our effort so far. It keeps us going, and quite possibly, clouds our judgement as to whether we should be spending our time on something more constructive.

We’re not particularily making this for the people you call UX practitioners. In our book, everyone involved in anything that relates to users interacting with something should be involved in UX and, hopefully, read this magazine.
Hong Hui
2 February 2006, 16:15 ( Permalink )
Alex: Haha, i see i see. Well, it’s a beta…so urm…i have nothing to say. :P

P.S: Heh, in 1024×768 (FF v1.5.0.1), the checkbox for the reply box looks kinda chunky and cute eh. Lol~
Alex Schleifer (UX Magazine)
2 February 2006, 16:33 ( Permalink )
Hong Hui: Indeed. ;) And yes, that checkbox behaves really strangely. Well spotted.
Paddy O'Furniture
3 February 2006, 18:35 ( Permalink )
I really like the design here. Very impressive and I like the originality. I also think you have some really nice content as well. Nice work!
Marko Mihelcic
5 February 2006, 14:28 ( Permalink )
Very nice work m8s, cheers!
Ben
5 February 2006, 22:19 ( Permalink )
I don’t think the search results pages are displaying correctly in Firefox, and I can’t search for “css” because all keywords apparently need at least 3 letters.
Constantinos Demetriadis (uxmag.com)
6 February 2006, 08:57 ( Permalink )
Ben: You’re right there. We’re currently using TxP ’s built in search engine with some minor modifications.

It’s on our list to make the search even better.
SpiritCrossing
6 February 2006, 18:21 ( Permalink )
how did you guys manage to get the little author profile to appear on the articles with textpattern? Is this profile hooked up to the author admin login or do u have it as another category? I’m stumped.
Constantinos Demetriadis (uxmag.com)
6 February 2006, 21:32 ( Permalink )
SpiritCrossing: Actually we’re using the rss_if_author plug-in originally created by Rob Sable. The plug-in can be found at his site wilshire|one . Again we’ve modified it a bit to suit our needs, but essentially, it’s the same plug-in.

Almost all of UX Magazine is being run off ready made plug-ins which we’ve altered. Others heavily, and others slightly. The whole concept was to create a site with minimum effort. And for that I personally thank the Textpattern crew, and the community behind it.

In our next major update, which should be coming in the following weeks, we’ll also be releasing a full list of all plug-ins used to create this site, along with some very important changes, most of which have been pointed out by our visitors…

Because, “We’re reading every single post…”
Susan
7 February 2006, 01:05 ( Permalink )
Just an FYI, the text in the section with the checkbox to open links in a new window is cut off at the bottom. It says “Open in new window?
Select this option if you want to have all external links open in a new” [does not say window]

I am using Safari 2.0.3 and viewing at 1280×854.

Overall I love the flexibilty of the design. However, it is a lot to take in all at once, a bit overwhelming visually. Cheers!
Susan
7 February 2006, 01:12 ( Permalink )
Addendum to that last post about the word “window” being cut off. I had my font size up one level…. All the words are visible at default font size.
Mark
8 February 2006, 20:10 ( Permalink )
I think it would make more sense if the “Design”, “Tech” and “Strategy” buttons were full color to begin with so that they connected immediately with their respective icons.

Having to mouse over them to see the connection is an unnecessary additional step.
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
8 February 2006, 21:57 ( Permalink )
Mark: VERY good point and one I will look into as we get out of beta. I am kind of contemplating getting rid of colour coding altogether and switch to a clearer taging system for the articles. Never happy.
York
9 February 2006, 11:36 ( Permalink )
It appears as thou on a dialup connection, the body text takes several seconds to align central to the parent div. Maybe the css for this is too low in the markup, thus loading later?

Great site. Nice and elegant. Entries are to the pint and not hyped up. Information as it is ;)
Ben
13 February 2006, 18:49 ( Permalink )
Is it just me or does http://www.mutationevent.com/ seem to look a lot like UXmag…
Ben
14 February 2006, 20:57 ( Permalink )
To follow-up on Mark’s comment:

a) You should really have a key for those D/T/S icons, (or just go with Mark’s suggestion.)

b) And even if you do go with Mark’s suggestion, the colors of the icons match up with the colors of the RSS, XHTML, CSS buttons at the bottom of the page. So when someone IS looking for a key, that’s all they see. Which is confusing. So you might consider switching something up.
Avi
14 February 2006, 23:08 ( Permalink )
I think you guys need to go back to the drawing board in terms of UI and layout. It took me 10 minutes to find the primary navigation. I tried clicking on the steve jobs quote, then his picture, I clicked on that green ad in the middle, didn’t even notice it was an add. There is no hierchy to your site. You don’t even have a proper H1 or H2 tag in your source. There is no sense of what is a link, how important the link is, or how to navigate. I’m sorry if I’m being critical, but this website breaks all the rules of UI for no reason, it isn’t like the site even looks special. It looks like a newspaper on a website and it isn’t even a good looking newspaper layout. Try again.
Laph
15 February 2006, 15:15 ( Permalink )
Try Validome.org to validate the site. There’s a minor bug regarding the onsubmit event handler with a missing meta tag stating the correct Content-Script-Type
Maharis
15 February 2006, 19:08 ( Permalink )
love the way you guys structured and styled this site for print. I love printing interesting articles, and this site got heaps!

eh heck, I love everything bout this site. Great stuff guys!!
Arthos
27 February 2006, 17:14 ( Permalink )
I just found a romanian “webdesigner” Cristian Tirsan that has on his portofolio a website(http://www.poloexpo.ro/) that is 90% identical to this one. His portofolio si avaiable at http://mdma.pcnation.ro/ He is working for this company Q-design Software http://www.qdesign.ro/
Andreea
2 March 2006, 11:14 ( Permalink )
Arthos, ur talking #$%@… 90% identical? I had a look at both of them, but that poloexpo just seem to be a little inspired. U cannot call that a rip.
pheloxi
8 March 2006, 14:01 ( Permalink )
can you please remove the 508 accessibility sign?

your website is not accessible and readable for people who are blind and visual impaired! I use mozilla firefox so I can overwrite internet explorer’s and your websites forced use of small fonts. 30% of your webpage is not readable with bigger fonts (arial 16).

it could be very intresting website if I could read it!

a very angry and very anoyed pheloxi feeling disciminated by small fonts.
Alex Schleifer (UX Mag)
8 March 2006, 14:24 ( Permalink )
Pheloxi: We are constantly trying to figure out new ways of making UXMag friendlier and more accessible while retaining its visual appeal. I also appreciate and agree with the the fact that currently the compliance buttons aren’t entirely representative of the site’s overall performance and this is something we are looking at very seriously. I apologize for the difficulties you have experienced.
James Bielefeldt
17 March 2006, 16:29 ( Permalink )
How can access your RSS feed directly without going to feeburner. I have my own reader that can parse the XML file.
James: Hello James, we’re routing our feed through FeedBurner in order to track it’s results. You can use our feed from the link we provide just as you would any other direct RSS feed.
John Hamman
27 March 2006, 17:24 ( Permalink )
Hey Guys, I wrote a review of this site with some suggestions. I would like to hear your opinion about it.
Case Study UX Magazine – When Good Design Is Poor Usability
roger
28 April 2006, 17:50 ( Permalink )
I applaud your efforts. It’s no secret that the usability engineering crowd is a tough audience to design for. No kidding! You’ll have critics waiting in line to tell you which principles you’ve violated at every turn. The reality is that this audience routinely frequents many notable UX gurus blogs or web sites that are not all that interesting visually, but usable, which is usually the point.

The point – What is the point? That the question. Is it simply to attempt to create a visually interesting format in which to discuss this field, or do you a really have something to say? I find the concept of UX as an on-line magazine compelling. However, when I look at it to try to discern what is your particular angle on this field or your unique contribution, it seems very fuzzy and undefined. After browsing and reading/skimming some articles, I still don’t know. Is it me?

Comments closed for this article.

About the author:
Also by this author

First Beta Launch

Monday December 19, 2005 by UX Magazine Staff

Here we go then. After months of working in the few crumbs of spare-time that we could scrape up we’ve finally done it and launched UX Magazine. We’re pleased with a lot of it but also know that a lot of work still needs to be done; a lot.

First off, we’re trying to remain XHTML strict and are avoiding hacks best we can but IE still misbehaves here and there. Annoying, yes, but the site works well enough to be released into the general population. There are certainly some bugs in other browsers here and there. Ah, the joys of web-development.

Secondly, We have a list of stuff to do before we can be certain that this site is truly user friendly. The tool tips on the Link Pool and the Feeds aren’t quite there yet. We need to make the preview text of articles clearer and some features are just plain missing.

Last but not least, we’re not happy. We never are. Never ever. We look at things and go “bah!”—out loud, numerous times a day. We just had to stop being so bloody picky and launch the damn thing. But that doesn’t mean we’re not going to fix these things. So while we’re excited about launching the site, we’ll probably never be 100% happy with it, and that’s the way it should be.

In the meantime, please comment (right here) on things you love, hate, are puzzled by. We’ve probably missed shed loads of important stuff so help us make UX Magazine what you want it to be.

UPDATE (19/12/05): We’ve applied a nasty hack and “fixed” some IE bug which just won’t go away otherwise. This is just band-aid but it will have to do for now. We’re also killing off the tool tips we had as we were getting too many issues with them. Shame because they were damn pretty.

UPDATE (20/12/05): Latest changes include a lot of stuff noticed by our visitors (thank you very much).

  1. We removed the email link from all our commenter’s. Now only a web link will be applied, if entered. (noticed by Alex Casanova)
  2. Fixed the home page a bit, still needs work though. Added the TextPattern credits (question asked by Roshambo)
  3. Changed the tabindex on the comment forms. Now it works as it should. (thanks Greg)
  4. The last update info in the SnapShot box on the Home page, now displays the actual last update time, including the comments.
  5. And last but not least, it seems Del.icio.us is back up, so now you can also see our Link Pool list on the home Page.

UPDATE (20/12/05) Part Deux: Got some new tabs done as the older ones where accused of being, well, rather crap. You can check out their dark chromed goodness by look at the top bar; ooh, shiny… CMD fixed some CSS stuff I broke while hacking away to get IE to bloody work. He also added a smooooth “back to top” at the bottom of every article. We’re working on a better way of integrating that into the design.

UPDATE (21/12/05): We’ve merged the search and tabs and fixed some issues in the process. With Christmas approaching fast, we’re scrambling to fix as much as possible before we’re all off for the holidays. IE unfortunately still misbehaves. The feedback and exposure we’ve been getting has been tremendous, which kind of freaks me out because there’s still so much to do. It’s 4am, I’m going to bed. Thanks for dropping by.

UPDATE (23/12/05): We’ve been very busy trying to get most of your comments into our layout. All of your remarks, complaints and praises have been very helpful. So to keep this note short, here’s what we’ve done so far:

  1. We’ve cleaned up our CSS. If anyone tries to validate it, they will get an error. It’s an ugly hack we’ve added, but will get rid of it shortly.
  2. We added more informative page titles.
  3. We finalized the “tab” & “search” design.
  4. We removed the horizontal scroll bar. The full fix will come when we get around to restructuring the whole site… Should be right after Xmas holidays.

UPDATE (23/12/05) Part Deux: Just got around to changing the descriptive text on all articles. The excerpt is now properly displayed.
Also please forgive us if you’ve been receiving one-too-many RSS updates on our articles. We’ve been fidgeting with the Feed a bit… until we get things sorted.